FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
NOV 22 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALVIN ABANO, No. 16-55325
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No.
2:15-cv-06268-SVW-AFM
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 16, 2017
Pasadena, California
Before: KOZINSKI and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and GETTLEMAN,** District
Judge.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The Honorable Robert W. Gettleman, United States District Judge for
the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
Abano appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for
wrongful foreclosure, to quiet title to real property, and for violations of
section 2924.17 of the California Civil Code and section 17200 of the California
Business and Professions Code. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
The deed of trust signed by Abano gives MERS the right to exercise the
interests of MortgageIT and its successors and assigns under the security
agreement; nothing in the deed of trust or our case law, see Cervantes v.
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2011), limits this authority
to lenders who are members of the MERS registry. Therefore, MERS had the
authority to assign and transfer the beneficial interest of the deed of trust to HSBC
and to substitute ETS as the trustee under the deed of trust.
Any irregularities in the assignment of the loan and deed of trust to HSBC,
as trustee for DBALT 2007-3, would render the assignment voidable rather than
void, and therefore Abano lacks standing to challenge such irregularities. See In re
Turner, 859 F.3d 1145, 1149 (9th Cir. 2017); Saterbak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A., 245 Cal. App. 4th 808, 815 (2016).
Because the defendants have the authority to institute nonjudicial foreclosure
proceedings, Abano’s claims based on wrongful foreclosure and a violation of
section 2924.17 fail, as does his quiet title action. His claim under section 17200
2
fails due to the lack of a predicate offense. See Wolski v. Fremont Inv. & Loan,
127 Cal. App. 4th 347, 357 (2005).1
AFFIRMED.
1
We grant defendants’ motion for judicial notice of the Notice of Default
and Notice of Rescission, which are matters of public record, see Lee v. City of Los
Angeles, 250 F.3d 668, 690 (9th Cir. 2001), and deny the motion for judicial notice
of the MERSCORP member search printout, because it is not “readily verifiable.”
Reyn’s Pasta Bella, LLC v. Visa USA, Inc., 442 F.3d 741, 746 n.6 (9th Cir. 2006).
3