United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1647
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Joshua R. Fuertes, also known as Rico
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: December 21, 2017
Filed: December 27, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Joshua Fuertes directly appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence the
district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to drug and firearm offenses, pursuant to
1
The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
a plea agreement containing an appeal waiver. Counsel has moved for leave to
withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
challenging Fuertes’s sentence, but conceding that the appeal waiver is applicable and
enforceable.
Having considered Fuertes’s arguments, we conclude that the appeal waiver
is enforceable. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo
review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver). The record establishes that
Fuertes entered into the plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and
voluntarily, the arguments on appeal fall within the scope of the waiver, and no
miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v.
Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889–92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). In addition, having
independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find
no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver. Accordingly, we
grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. The appeal is dismissed.
______________________________
-2-