United States v. Espinoza-Naranjo

Case: 20-40567 Document: 00515911338 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 23, 2021 No. 20-40567 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Pascual Espinoza-Naranjo, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:20-CR-977-1 Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pascual Espinoza-Naranjo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Espinoza-Naranjo has filed a response. * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-40567 Document: 00515911338 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/23/2021 No. 20-40567 We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Espinoza-Naranjo’s response. It is dispositive that the Government has declined to waive the untimeliness of the appeal. See United States v. Pesina-Rodriguez, 825 F.3d 787, 788 (5th Cir. 2016). Therefore, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 2