Bachant v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1841V UNPUBLISHED ROBERT BACHANT, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: June 4, 2021 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Damages Decision Based on Proffer; HUMAN SERVICES, Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain- Barre Syndrome (GBS) Respondent. Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. Mark Kim Hellie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On December 4, 2019, Robert Bachant filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a table injury of Guillain-Barre syndrome (“GBS”) as a result of a December 22, 2016 influenza vaccination. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was administered within the United States, that he suffered the sequelae of his injury for more than six months, and that no party has received any compensation in the form of an award or settlement for his vaccine-related injury. Petition at 1, 3. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. On November 23, 2020, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for GBS. On June 3, 2021, Respondent filed a proffer on award 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded $172,557.37 (comprised of $165,000.00 for pain and suffering, and $7,557.37 for unreimbursed medical expenses). Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. at 2. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $172,557.37 (comprised of $165,000.00 for pain and suffering, and $7,557.37 for unreimbursed medical expenses) in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ROBERT BACHANT, Petitioner, Case No. 19-1841V (ECF) v. CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER CORCORAN SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION I. Procedural History On November 20, 2020, respondent filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report concluding that Robert Bachant (“petitioner”) suffered an injury that is compensable under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to - 34 (“the Act”). ECF No. 20. Accordingly, on November 23, 2020, the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation under the Act. ECF No. 22. II. Items of Compensation and Form of the Award Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $172,557.37. The award is comprised of the following: $165,000.00 for pain and suffering and $7,557.37 for unreimbursed medical expenses. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) regarding his December 22, 2016, influenza vaccination. Petitioner agrees. 1 III. Form of the Award The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $172,557.37, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Petitioner agrees. Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respectfully submitted, BRIAN M. BOYNTON Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D’ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division HEATHER L. PEARLMAN Acting Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division DARRYL R. WISHARD Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division 1 Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering. 2 s/ Mark K. Hellie MARK K. HELLIE Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 T: (202) 616-4208 E: mark.hellie@usdoj.gov DATED: June 3, 2021 3