UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 21-1174
DEAFUEH MONBO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JUAHDI MONBO,
Plaintiff,
v.
UPPER CHESAPEAKE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.; HARFORD MEMORIAL
HOSPITAL, INC.; ESKINDER AFEWORK, individually and as an employee of
Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; DEREK ANDREW MCCOY, individually
and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; LAURENCE MARC
EDELMAN, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center,
Inc.; NICK NIKOLAOS T. LOMIS, individually and as an employee of Upper
Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; ASHLEY KIMBEL, individually and as an
employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; REBECCA N. SMITH,
individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc.; DANA
M. SAULSBURY, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical
Center, Inc.; ADAM ROSENBLATT, individually and as an employee of Harford
Memorial Hospital, Inc.; BRIAN GREGORY LAROCCO, individually and as an
employee of Harford Memorial Hospital, Inc.; UNION HOSPITAL OF CECIL
COUNTY, INC.; CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.; BRITTNI D.
JONES, individually and as an employee of Union Hospital of Cecil County, Inc.;
TIMOTHY CLARKE, individually and as an employee of Union Hospital of Cecil
County, Inc.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00004-CCB)
Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 22, 2021
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deafueh Monbo, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Anthony Damiano, SHAW, MORROW &
JOSEPH, PA, Hunt Valley, Maryland; Michael Kevin Wiggins, WHARTON, LEVIN,
EHRMANTRAUT & KLEIN, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland; Benjamin Skipp Harvey,
KIERNAN TREBACH, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Carolyn Israel Stein, CAROLYN
STEIN, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Deafueh Monbo seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion for
recusal. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen
v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Monbo seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Vuono
v. United States, 441 F.2d 271, 272 (4th Cir. 1971). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3