United States v. Martin

Case: 20-40402      Document: 00515949202         Page: 1    Date Filed: 07/22/2021




              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                              United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                             FILED
                                  No. 20-40402                           July 22, 2021
                                Summary Calendar                        Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                             Clerk

   United States of America,

                                                             Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Scott Michael Martin,

                                                          Defendant—Appellant.


                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Eastern District of Texas
                            USDC No. 4:19-CR-4-1


   Before King, Ho, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Scott Michael Martin has moved
   for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
   California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th
   Cir. 2011). Martin has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s


          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 20-40402     Document: 00515949202          Page: 2   Date Filed: 07/22/2021




                                   No. 20-40402


   brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
   with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
   appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
   GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
   the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.




                                        2