IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STERLING TATE1, §
§
Respondent Below, § No. 395, 2020
Appellant, §
§ Court Below – Family Court
v. § of the State of Delaware
§
CAMILLE TATE, §
§ File No. CN18-03247
Petitioner Below, § Petition No. 20-10933
Appellee. §
§
Submitted: August 11, 2021
Decided: September 7, 2021
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; TRAYNOR and MONTGOMERY-REEVES, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the briefs and record on appeal, we conclude that the
judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in the Family
Court’s October 20, 2020 final custody order. In reaching this conclusion, we have
determined that the Family Court did not impose a condition on the Appellant’s ability to file
a petition for modification, but rather illustrated steps that the Appellant ought to—but need
not—take before seeking visitation rights.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Tamika R. Montgomery-Reeves
Justice
1
The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).