Matter of Hill v City of Rochester (2021 NY Slip Op 05259)
Decided on October 1, 2021
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. (Filed Oct. 1, 2021.)
MOTION NO. (854/20) CA 19-01080.
| Matter of Hill v City of Rochester |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 05259 |
| Decided on October 1, 2021 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on October 1, 2021
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. (Filed Oct. 1, 2021.)
MOTION NO. (854/20) CA 19-01080.
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF COALITION FOR COBBS HILL, BY ITS CO-CHAIRPERSON THOMAS PASTECKI, COBBS HILL VILLAGE TENANTS' ASSOCIATION, BY ITS PRESIDENT LEE SENGBUSCH, LEE SENGBUSCH, CAROLINE REAMORE, KENNETH BOICE, CAROL WILSON, BARBARA VANWIE, BRENT GRATTAN, THE ABC STREETS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC., THE FRIENDS OF WASHINGTON GROVE, INC., UPPER MONROE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, BY ITS PRESIDENT CHRISTENA STEVENS, AND NUNDA BOULEVARD ASSOCIATION, BY ITS PRESIDENT JEFF MILLS, PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
CITY OF ROCHESTER, CITY OF ROCHESTER PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF ROCHESTER MANAGER OF ZONING, PLYMOUTH GARDENS, INC., ROCHESTER MANAGEMENT, INC., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS.
v
CITY OF ROCHESTER, CITY OF ROCHESTER PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF ROCHESTER MANAGER OF ZONING, PLYMOUTH GARDENS, INC., ROCHESTER MANAGEMENT, INC., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.