ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Mr. Dennis M. Eshnaur appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for lack of preparation and in failing to challenge various issues. He also claims that his post-conviction relief counsel abandoned him.
For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).