United States v. Armstead

Case: 21-50397      Document: 00516154100         Page: 1     Date Filed: 01/04/2022




              United States Court of Appeals
                   for the Fifth Circuit                               United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit

                                                                              FILED
                                                                        January 4, 2022
                                  No. 21-50397
                                Summary Calendar                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk


   United States of America,

                                                              Plaintiff—Appellee,

                                       versus

   Michael Armstead,

                                                           Defendant—Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                            USDC No. 1:19-CR-192-5


   Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
   Per Curiam:*
          The attorney appointed to represent Michael Armstead has moved for
   leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
   386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
   Armstead has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the


          *
            Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
   opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
   circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.
Case: 21-50397    Document: 00516154100          Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/04/2022




                                  No. 21-50397


   relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Armstead’s
   response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
   nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
   leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
   responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
   R. 42.2.




                                       2