Judgment and order reversed on the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that the question asked a juror by plaintiff’s coubsel constituted reversible error. All concur, except Davis, J., who dissents on the ground that the record is not sufficient to disclose misconduct on the part of plaintiff’s counsel. .
Eron v. Schafer
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date filed: 1923-11-15
Citations: 207 A.D. 890
Copy CitationsLead Opinion