Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered September 12, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his plea of guilty was induced by an unfulfilled promise and, therefore, he should have been permitted to withdraw his plea (see People v Torres, 45 NY2d 751, 753 [1978]; People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 241 [1974], cert denied 419 US 1122 [1975]; People v Burton, 133 AD2d 276, 277 [1987]; People v Declemente, 108 AD2d 868 [1985]). However, this principle is not applicable where the defendant’s claim has not been preserved for appellate review and where the sentence actually imposed was not abusive or illegal (see People v Lewis, 216 AD2d 328 [1995]; People v Burton, 133 AD2d at 277, supra; People v Ifill, 108 AD2d 202, 203 [1985]). At the time of the plea, the court offered the defendant a sentence of six months incarceration and probation subject to an evaluation. The defendant expressly rejected this offer and indicated that he preferred an indeterminate term of incarceration of 1 to 3 years. At