Gearing v. Kelly

Eager, J.,

dissents in the following memorandum: I would affirm. In my opinion, there is a sufficient showing of merit to support the limited examination directed by Special Term, and, bearing in mind that plaintiffs are 50% stockholders of the defendant corporation, there are “ special circumstances ” justifying the examination. (See Steinberg v. Altschuler, 12 A D 2d 479.) The order of Special Term was fully in keeping with the liberal policy of courts in allowing examinations before trial to simplify the issues for the trial and to expedite justice.