Interman Industrial Products, Ltd. v. R. S. M. Electron Power, Inc.

Shapiro, J. (concurring).

I concur for affirmance, but I do not agree with the statement of the majority that under certain circumstances an account stated may represent an agreement for the payment of money only ” if that statement is meant to imply that an account stated may under certain circumstances come within the purview of CPLB 3213.