Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered June 15, 1990, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The complainant testified, inter
We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention that the lineups conducted on January 5, 1989, were unduly suggestive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Johnson, 172 AD2d 774; People v Wiley, 137 AD2d 735). Mangano, P. J., Harwood, Balletta and Eiber, JJ., concur.