—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.), rendered January 22, 1993, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
The court’s determination that the defendant violated the conditions of his probation was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see, CPL 410.70 [3]; People v Rennie, 190 AD2d 830; People v Machia, 96 AD2d 1113).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.