UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-1274
In re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1)
Submitted: March 23, 2022 Decided: March 28, 2022
Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chestnut petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed scheduling a final supervised release revocation hearing.
He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the
record reveals that, after Chestnut filed his mandamus petition, the district court scheduled
the final supervised release revocation hearing and then Chestnut filed a counseled consent
motion to continue the hearing, which the district court granted. Accordingly, we deny the
mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2