Weiner v. Southeast Banking Corp.

                      United States Court of Appeals,

                             Eleventh Circuit.

                                No. 94-4006.

         In re SOUTHEAST BANKING CORP., SECURITIES LITIGATION.

     Harvey WEINER, et al., a national banking association,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,

                                       v.

 SOUTHEAST BANKING CORP., Charles J. Zwick, John Porta, G. Dodson
Mathias, Paul Hill, Kirsten M. Hudak, Defendants,

 William A. Brandt, Jr., as Administrator of the Investment Plus
Plan of Southeast Banking Corp., Appellant.

                                May 9, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Florida. (No. 90-760-CIV-KMM), K. Michael Moore, Judge.

Before COX and BLACK, Circuit Judges, and FAY, Senior Circuit
Judge.

     PER CURIAM:

     This    appeal    arises   from   a    class   action   settled    against

Southeast Banking Corporation.          The district court approved the

settlement and was faced with the issue of attorneys's fees and

costs.    William A. Brandt, Jr., as administrator of a pension plan

for former Southeast Bank employees, objected to the request for

attorneys's fees by class counsel.           The district judge overruled

the objection and approved attorneys's fees of twenty-five percent

of the settlement.      Brandt attempts to appeal that ruling.

     Brandt was not a named party.          He never moved to intervene in

the class action as administrator of the pension plan.                 Here, he

attempts to base standing to appeal on his having objected to the

request for attorneys's fees.

     We find that our Circuit's precedent is clearly established in
Guthrie   v.    Evans,   815   F.2d   626   (11th   Cir.1987).   Brandt,   a

non-named class member who failed to intervene, lacks standing to

appeal    the    district      court's      order   on   attorneys's   fees.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

     APPEAL DISMISSED.