Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, Inc.

74 F.3d 1528

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
MICHIGAN DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 94-1778.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

April 9, 1996.

BEFORE: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.