Garrett v. Sam H. Goodman Bldg. Co., Inc.

Order                                                                                        Michigan Supreme Court
                                                                                                   Lansing, Michigan

  December 8, 2005                                                                                       Clifford W. Taylor,
                                                                                                                 Chief Justice

  128951                                                                                               Michael F. Cavanagh
                                                                                                       Elizabeth A. Weaver
                                                                                                              Marilyn Kelly
                                                                                                         Maura D. Corrigan
  NANCY GARRETT,                                                                                       Robert P. Young, Jr.
          Plaintiff-Appellant,                                                                         Stephen J. Markman,
                                                                                                                      Justices

  v        	                                                        SC: 128951     

                                                                    COA: 251793      

                                                                    Wayne CC: 02-226727-NI

  SAM H. GOODMAN BUILDING COMPANY,

  INC., and DONALD BRYANT, d/b/a D & B 

  CEMENT,

              Defendants-Appellees.

  _________________________________________/

          On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2005
  judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in
  lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the Court of Appeals affirmance of the
  trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant Goodman Building, and
  we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further proceedings. Summary
  disposition should not have been granted for defendant Goodman Building because it did
  not move for summary disposition. Further, summary disposition based on the “open and
  obvious” doctrine was improper because neither defendant was the premises possessor.
  Ghaffari v Turner Constr Co, 473 Mich 16, 23 (2005). The Court of Appeals erred in
  applying Fultz v Union-Commerce Associates, 470 Mich 460 (2004), to defendant
  Goodman Building because it and plaintiff were in contractual privity.

          In all further respects, leave to appeal is DENIED because we are not persuaded
  that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.




                           I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the
                     foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
                           December 8, 2005                    _________________________________________
           t1201                                                               Clerk