UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7127
KENDELL C. ALEXANDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 99-7540
KENDELL C. ALEXANDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
99-298-PJM)
Submitted: January 11, 2000 Decided: February 8, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kendell C. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Appellant Kendell C. Alexander
appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (1994) petition and reconsideration of that order. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on
the reasoning of the district court. See Alexander v. United
States, No. CA-99-298-PJM (D. Md. July 27 & Sept. 30, 1999). We
deny Alexander’s motion to remand filed in No. 99-7127.
Furthermore, we deny Alexander’s motions captioned “Motion of
Expedite of Appeals” and “Motion to Strike Appellee’s Response to
Appellant’s Pro Se Informal Brief.” We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3