Visser v. United States District Court Judges

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-2374 HENK VISSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES OF MARY- LAND; JOSEPH YOUNG; WILLIAM NICKERSON; BILL CLINTON, President; QUEEN OF THE NETHERLANDS; THOSE UNDER THE TREATY OF BOGOTA AND THE HAGUE; DONNA SHALALA; BAR OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-00- 2878-AMD) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: February 2, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henk Visser, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Henk Visser appeals the district court’s order dismissing Visser’s mandamus petition as frivolous. We have reviewed the rec- ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Visser v. United States District Court Judges, No. CA-00-2878-AMD (D. Md. Oct. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. We deny the petition for pro se writ of mandamus. AFFIRMED 2