UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7943
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM EARL MARSHALL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-91-195)
Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 27, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Earl Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Timothy Calloway,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William Earl Marshall appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion challenging the sufficiency of the indictment
under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2). We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
States v. Marshall, No. CR-91-195 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2