United States v. Marshall

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6125 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM EARL MARSHALL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-195-C-P, CA-97-236-3-P) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Earl Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. David Culver Keesler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Marshall, Nos. CR-91-195-C-P; CA-97-236-3-P (W.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 1997; Dec. 16, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2