UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2368
SHERRY D. BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES E. POSTON, Individually and in his
official capacity as Chief Judge, Fourth
Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of
the City of Norfolk; JOHN C. MORRISON, JR.;
JOHN E. CLARKSON; WILLIAM F. RUTHERFORD;
EVERETT A. MARTIN, JR.; LYDIA C. TAYLOR; MARC
JACOBSON; JUNIUS P. FULTON, III; JOSEPH A.
LEAFE, Individually and in their official
capacities as Judges, Fourth Judicial Circuit
of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of
Norfolk; ALBERT TEICH, individually and in his
official capacity as Clerk, Circuit Court of
the City of Norfolk; CHARLES STUDDS,
Individually and in his former official
capacity as Chief Magistrate for the City of
Norfolk; CHARLES D. GRIFFITH, JR.,
Individually and in his official capacity as
Commonwealth’s Attorney of the City of
Norfolk; WILLIAM P. ROBINSON, JR.; KENNETH E.
ROBERTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 01-2472
SHERRY D. BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES E. POSTON, Individually and in his
official capacity as Chief Judge, Fourth
Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of
the City of Norfolk; JOHN C. MORRISON, JR.;
JOHN E. CLARKSON; WILLIAM F. RUTHERFORD;
EVERETT A. MARTIN, JR.; LYDIA C. TAYLOR; MARC
JACOBSON; JUNIUS P. FULTON, III; JOSEPH A.
LEAFE, Individually and in their official
capacities as Judges, Fourth Judicial Circuit
of Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of
Norfolk; ALBERT TEICH, individually and in his
official capacity as Clerk, Circuit Court of
the City of Norfolk; CHARLES STUDDS,
Individually and in his former official
capacity as Chief Magistrate for the City of
Norfolk; CHARLES D. GRIFFITH, JR.,
Individually and in his official capacity as
Commonwealth’s Attorney of the City of
Norfolk; WILLIAM P. ROBINSON, JR.; KENNETH E.
ROBERTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 01-2484
SHERRY D. BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ELITE CHILD, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
versus
SCHRODER CHESAPEAKE, INCORPORATED, t/a
Greenbrier Mall; E. PRESTON GRISSOM,
Individually and in his capacity of Judge,
2
Judicial Circuit of Virginia, Circuit Court of
the City of Chesapeake; CHARLES E. POSTON,
Individually and in his official capacity as
Chief Judge, Fourth Judicial Circuit of
Virginia, Circuit Court of the City of
Norfolk; JOHN C. MORRISON, JR.; JOHN E.
CLARKSON; WILLIAM F. RUTHERFORD; EVERETTE A.
MARTIN, JR.; LYDIA C. TAYLOR; MARC JACOBSON;
JUNIUS P. FULTON, III; JOSEPH A. LEAFE,
Individually and in their official capacity as
Judges, Fourth Judicial Circuit of Virginia,
Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk; ALBERT
TEICH, Individually and in his official
capacity as Clerk, Circuit Court of the City
of Norfolk; CHARLES STUDDS, Individually and
in his former official capacity as Chief
Magistrate for the City of Norfolk; CHARLES D.
GRIFFITH, JR., Individually and in his
official capacity as Commonwealth’s Attorney
of the City of Norfolk; WILLIAM P. ROBINSON,
JR.; KENNETH E. ROBERTS,
Defendants - Appellees,
versus
LUTHER C. EDMONDS,
Movant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-01-30-2, CA-98-488-2, MISC-01-30-2)
Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
3
Sherry D. Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Brody Rashkind, FURNISS,
DAVIS, RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia; Mark L. Earley,
Gregory E. Lucyk, Edward Meade Macon, Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
In Nos. 01-2368 and 01-2472, Sherry Battle appeals from the
district court’s orders denying her application for leave to file
a 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. The district
court denied Battle’s application, because she failed to comply
with the terms of a properly imposed prefiling injunction. In No.
01-2484, Battle appeals from the district court’s order denying her
motion to set aside a prior order entering sanctions against her.
We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. Battle v. Poston, No. CA-01-30-2; Battle v.
Shroder Chesapeake, Inc., No. CA-98-488-2 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 11,
2001 & entered Oct. 12, 2001; Dec. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
4