Filed: July 26, 2000
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1203
(CA-00-15-2)
Sherry D. Battle,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
Charles Studds, etc., et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed July 19, 2000, as follows:
On the cover sheet, section 5 -- the panel information is
corrected to read: “Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit
Judges.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1203
SHERRY D. BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES STUDDS, Individually and in his offi-
cial capacity as Chief Magistrate for the City
of Norfolk; CITY OF NORFOLK; RALPH HAMLIN;
KEITH DAVIES; D. A. NEWMAN, Individually and
in their official capacities as Sergeants for
the Norfolk Police Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard L. Williams, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-15-2)
Submitted: July 13, 2000 Decided: July 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherry D. Battle, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Sherry D. Battle appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing her civil action for failing to comply with a pre-filing
injunction entered on October 20, 1999. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Battle v. Studds, No. CA-00-15-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3