UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6155
JAMES L. JACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER FLOURNOY; OFFICER BROWN; OFFICER
LEVESQUE; LIEUTENANT WERLIN, Shift Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-00-824)
Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James L. Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing
without prejudice his complaint alleging violations under 42
U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001). The court dismissed Jack’s
complaint based on his failure to allege sufficient facts regarding
the knowledge of named defendants in reference to a specific risk
to Jack’s safety while incarcerated. Because Jack might proceed
with this action by amending his complaint to provide the
information specified by the district court, the dismissal order is
not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino
Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67
(4th Cir. 1993).
We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2