UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6259
JAMES L. JACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden; JANET TERRY, Law
Library Coordinator; SERGEANT FRAME,
Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-00-830-3)
Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James L. Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing
without prejudice his complaint alleging violations under 42
U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001). The court dismissed Jack’s
complaint based on his failure to allege sufficient facts regarding
the actual prejudice suffered as a result of his alleged denial of
his constitutional right of access to the courts. Because Jack
might proceed with this action by amending his complaint to provide
the information specified by the district court, the dismissal
order is not final and thus is not subject to appellate review.
See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d
1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We therefore dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2