Jack v. Robinson

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7580 JAMES L. JACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden; JANET TERRY, Law Library Coordinator; SERGEANT FRAME, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-00-830-3) Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: March 10, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James Lee Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jack v. Robinson, No. CA-00-830-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2