UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6199
LEE ROY SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICKEY E. RAY, Warden, FCI Edgefield; J. D.
CASTILLO, Health Services Administrator at FCI
Edgefield; JOSE A. SERANNO, MD and Clinical
Director at FCI Edgefield; JUAN F. CARMONA,
JR., Lieutenant at FCI Edgefield; LISA
MORGAN-JOHNSON, Counselor at FCI Edgefield;
RICK FOX, Unit Manager at FCI Edgefield;
DOUGLAS HOLFORD, Contracted Orthopedic
Specialist at FCI Edgefield,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-01-239-2-18)
Submitted: May 1, 2002 Decided: June 3, 2002
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lee Roy Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lee Roy Smith appeals from the dismissal of his Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971) action. We have reviewed the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Thus, we affirm substantially on the
reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Ray, No. CA-01-239-2-18
(D.S.C. Dec. 14, 2001). Additionally, with regard to Smith’s
retaliation claim, Smith alleges that prison officials retaliated
against him on the basis of his past administrative grievances and
to prevent him from filing future grievances. However, because
access to the grievance procedure is not a constitutionally
protected right, Smith’s claim must fail. See Adams v. Rice, 40
F.3d 72, 74 (4th Cir. 1994). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2