Diaz v. Baan

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7645 PEDRO DIAZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DOCTOR “JOHN DOE” BAAN; GEORGE WILKES; BARBARA KNIGHT; HOPE HARRISON, Defendants - Appellees, and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS UTILIZATION REVIEW BOARD, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-263-5-BR) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 7, 2003 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Pedro Diaz, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Pedro Diaz appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Diaz v. Baan, No. CA-01-263-5-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 26, 2002 & entered Sept. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2