Crudup v. Seay

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7757 SYLVESTER CRUDUP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARCIA SEAY, Grievance Coordinator/ Institutional Ombudsman; S. HUGHES, Grievance, Institutional Ombudsman; L. B. COLLINS, Inmate Hearing Officer; K. ORIE, Correctional Officer; W. BEST, Lieutenant, Correctional Officer; A. NETHERLAND, Captain, Correctional Officer; A. S. SCOTT, Captain, Correctional Officer; J. KEITT, Captain, Correctional Officer; L. BOOKER, Correctional Officer; S. MOORE, Sergeant, Correctional Officer; A. L. JOHNSON, Captain, Correctional Officer; W. PENN, Correctional Officer; SUSAN CARSON, Operations Officer; C. C. MURPHY, Assistant Warden of Operations; ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden; W. P. ROGER, Regional Director; P. M. HENICK, Regional Ombudsman, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-755-2) Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 26, 2003 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sylvester Crudup, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Sylvester Crudup appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Crudup v. Seay, No. CA-02- 755-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2