Nelson v. Hamilton

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6333 RICKY DONNELL NELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY K. HAMILTON; TOD RUNYON; VALERIE CARTER; OFFICER SMALL; LIEUTENANT WETHERHEAD; LIEUTENANT RANDLE; LIEUTENANT CHALLOUGHLCZISE; MARY JANE VIVEROS; WILLIAM DANFORD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-741-2) Submitted: July 13, 2005 Decided: August 2, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Donnell Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ricky Donnell Nelson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nelson v. Hamilton, No. CA-03-741-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -