UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1548
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN ZACKER,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 05-1694
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN ZACKER,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 05-1718
MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN ZACKER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
05-1205-PJM)
Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: September 29, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Michael J. Sindram appeals
a district court order and judgment dismissing without prejudice
his civil rights complaint, denying a motion for a temporary
restraining order and denying a motion for clarification and
modification. In dismissing without prejudice Sindram’s complaint,
the court instructed Sindram as to the deficiencies in the
complaint and how they may be cured. Because Sindram may refile
his complaint, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not
appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union
392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Likewise, we dismiss
the appeals from the orders denying his motion for a TRO and
denying his motion for clarification. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 3 -