UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6249
VONCILLE O. STUKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
RICHARD H. GOTTLIEB, Officer In Charge; JUDY T. FERGUSON,
Supervisor Immigration Officer; ROSEMARY L. MELVILLE,
District Director,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00316-MR-CH)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: October 1, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Voncille O. Stukes, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Voncille O. Stukes appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Stukes’
claims of race and disability discrimination and retaliation,
and denying reconsideration of that order. With respect to the
district court’s order denying reconsideration, Stukes has
failed to challenge that order on appeal and, therefore, has
forfeited appellate review of that order. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b). With respect to the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the Appellee, we have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Stukes v. Chertoff,
No. 3:06-cv-00316-MR-CH (W.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3