UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6096
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; COUNSELOR JACKSON; BRUCE PEARSON;
HARLEY LAPPIN; LARRY RANDLE; CONSTANCE REESE; CHAPLAIN
HOLSTEN; CHAPLAIN WILLIAMS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON;
JERRY BARBER, Correctional Officer; GERALD BRATCHER;
MCCUTCHON; SOUTHERLAND; KATHERYN LAWSON, Doctor; CHRISTOPHER
CURRY; MILDRED GREER; EDEN WHITE; COUNSELOR GRIFFEN; CAMERON
LINDSEY; MARC RENDA; ART ROBERTS; JULIE NICKLIN; WALTER
HARRIS; D. GREEN; DENISE BREWER; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY;
CHAPLAIN ZICKEFOOSE; CHAPLAIN ROBINSON,
Respondents – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:08-hc-02117-BO)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s
order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 5:08-hc-02117-BO (E.D.N.C.
Dec. 31, 2008). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2