did not abuse its discretion in awarding respondent attorney fees.' See
NRS 125.150(3); see also River° v. Rivero, 125 Nev. 410, 441, 216 P.3d 213,
234 (2009) (explaining that a district court must make specific findings of
fact regarding the evidence supporting the court's award of attorney fees
as a sanction). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Cynthia N. Giuliani, District Judge
Robert E. Gaston, Settlement Judge
Roberts Stoffel Family Law Group
Sterling Law, LLC
Hofland & Tomsheck
Eighth District Court Clerk
'As NRS 125.150(3) does not require a party to prevail in order to
recover attorney fees, we conclude that appellant's argument that
respondent could not recover attorney fees because the parties settled
their divorce action lacks merit.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A