Arthur Rodgers v. Bobby Shearin

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6500 ARTHUR RODGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY SHEARIN; SERGEANT SIRES; OFFICER STEVENS; LIEUTENANT WILT; OFFICER MALLOW; OFFICER RALEY; GREG FLURY, Physician’s Assistant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01585-CCB) Submitted: July 18, 2013 Decided: July 23, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur Rodgers, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, Richard P. Seitz, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Arthur Rodgers appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying relief on Rodgers’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rodgers v. Shearin, No. 1:11-cv-01585-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2