The district court further found that appellant abandoned the
children and failed to maintain any contact with the children after he was
aware that they were in protective custody. See NRS 128.012. Moreover,
the court found that appellant is incarcerated in the State of Oklahoma for
arson, and that prior to his incarceration, he failed to complete any case
plan on earlier petitions where the children were found to be in need of
protection. See NRS 128.0126; NRS 128.106(6); In re Parental Rights as to
K.D.L., 118 Nev. 737, 747-48, 58 P.3d 181, 187-88 (2002). Finally, the
district court found that the children have been placed with familiar foster
parents, who wish to adopt them. See NRS 128.108. Having reviewed the
record, we conclude that the district court's decision to terminate
appellant's parental rights is supported by substantial evidence. In re
Parental Rights as to D.R.H., 120 Nev. 422, 428, 92 P.3d 1230, 1234
(2004). Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Parraguirre
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
IIMEMEREMI
cc: Hon. Cheryl B. Moss, District Judge, Family Court Division
Jerry H.
Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada
Clark County District Attorney
Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A