IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-60442
Summary Calendar
____________________
RODNEY BELL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RAYMOND ROBERTS,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Mississippi
(4:96CV189-S-B)
________________________________________________________________
_
November 6, 1996
Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
In this case, the plaintiff alleges no basis for a claim of
denial of constitutional due process. His pleadings reflect that
he is essentially dissatisfied with the result of the disciplinary
proceedings. In addition, he alleges only in the most general
terms that the defendants’ decisions violated his rights (which
were undescribed) and that the decisions were against the weight of
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
the evidence. These allegations do not rise to the level of
stating a section 1983 claim, and such bare allegations do not
require a Spears’ hearing to develop the claim. See Spears v.
McCotter, 766 F.2d 179, 181 (5th Cir. 1985). The judgment of the
district court, dismissing the complaint is therefore
A F F I R M E D.