Armond v. Carney

                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 97-60317
                         Conference Calendar



CLEVELAND CLAY ARMOND,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TERRY CARNEY; PATTY LYNE CARNEY; JOHN DOE,

                                          Defendants-Appellees.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
             for the Southern District of Mississippi
                      USDC No. 3:97-CV-167WS
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                          December 9, 1997
Before BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Cleveland Clay Armond, Mississippi prisoner #34189, appeals

the dismissal as frivolous of his pro se, in forma pauperis

civil-rights lawsuit against his former father-in-law, Terry

Carney; his ex-wife, Patty Lyne Carney; and her present husband,

identified only as John Doe (collectively referred to as “the

defendants”).   Armond argues that the district court erred in

concluding that he had failed to allege any state action in

connection with his allegation that the defendants violated his

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 97-60317
                                 -2-

constitutional rights during the course of having his parental

rights judicially terminated.

     Armond has failed to allege that the defendants acted under

the color of law, and his claim is therefore not actionable under

42 U.S.C. § 1983.    See Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144,

150 (1970).   His appeal is without arguable merit and is

frivolous.    See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983).   Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed.   See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

     Armond is cautioned that the filing of any additional

frivolous lawsuits or appeals will result in his being barred

from proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to the Prison

Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

     DISMISSED.