IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-60862
Summary Calendar
KHAN AHMED ARIF,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - -
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A91-541-399
- - - - - - - - - -
September 30, 1998
Before DAVIS, DUHE’, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Khan Ahmed Arif seeks a petition for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) October 22, 1996, denial of his
application for asylum. Arif asserts that the BIA made numerous
errors in evaluating the evidence that he submitted. We have
thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs, find no error in
the BIA’s evaluation of the evidence, and find that the BIA’s
finding that Arif is not eligible for asylum is supported by
substantial evidence. See Gomez-Mejia v. I.N.S., 56 F.3d 700,
702 (5th Cir. 1995). Arif has not met his burden of showing
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 96-60862
-2-
“that the evidence he presented [is] so compelling that no
reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of
persecution.’" Jukic v. I.N.S., 40 F.3d 747, 749 (5th Cir.
1994).
Arif has raised for the first time in the petition for
review that the INS violated his rights before, during, and after
the deportation proceedings.
To the extent that we have jurisdiction to review these
claims, we have determined that the claims lack merit. Arif also
asserts for the first time in his petition for review that he was
denied effective assistance of counsel at his bond hearings and
that counsel failed to appeal the bond hearing. The record is
not adequately developed to allow us to review these claims in
the first instance. Arif’s petition for review is DENIED.
Arif’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED.
PETITION FOR REVIEWED DENIED; MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD
DENIED.