UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-50038
Summary Calendar
ROGELIO ROSAS,JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(SA-97-CV-402)
October 2, 1998
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rogelio M. Rosas, Jr., appeals the dismissal of his complaint for judicial
review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security which denied his
claim for Supplemental Security Income benefits. Rosas contends that the
Administrative Law Judge erred in determining that his medical condition does not
significantly interfere with his daily activities. He further contends that the ALJ
posed an inadequate hypothetical question to the vocational expert. Rosas did not
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
raise these issues in objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation and the
district court did not engage in a de novo review. We must, therefore, review these
contentions for plain error.1
Our review of the record and the briefs of the parties discloses no error, plain
or otherwise, and for essentially the reasons relied upon by the district court we
now AFFIRM.2
1
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
2
Rosas v. Callahan, No. SA-97-CA-0402 (W.D.Tex. October 14, 1997 and
November 24, 1997).
2