FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
January 11, 2008
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
No. 07-1245
v. (D.C. No. 06-cr-489-EWN)
(D. Colo.)
MIGUEL ANGEL GUERRA-SERNA,
Defendant - Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before KELLY, ANDERSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. **
Defendant-Appellant Miguel Guerra-Serna pleaded guilty to reentry of a
deported alien previously convicted of an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. §
1326(a) & (b)(2). The previous aggravated felony conviction was transporting
illegal aliens. Mr. Guerra-Serna was sentenced to 46 months’ imprisonment and
three years’ supervised release. On appeal, Mr. Guerra-Serna’s counsel has filed
*
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th
Cir. R. 32.1.
**
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge
panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material
assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th
Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
an Anders brief because she identified no potentially meritorious issues for
appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mr. Guerra-Serna was
served with a copy of the Anders brief by counsel, and no response has been filed.
Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we
dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Following Mr. Guerra-Serna’s guilty plea, a presentence investigation
report (PSR) was prepared. The PSR calculated the applicable Guideline
sentencing range to be 46 to 57 months’ imprisonment given a total offense level
of 21, and a criminal history category of III. IV R Doc. 5, 12; III R. 4. At the
sentencing hearing, both counsel for Mr. Guerra-Serna and the government
recommended that the district court impose a sentence of 46 months’
imprisonment, the bottom of the Guideline range. III R. 3.
We agree with Mr. Guerra-Serna’s counsel that no potentially meritorious
issues are present on appeal. First, there is no reason to believe that Mr. Guerra-
Serna’s plea was anything but knowing and voluntary. See Brady v. United
States, 397 U.S. 742, 755–56 (1970). Second, we agree with appellate counsel
that a claim that the sentence is substantively unreasonable (after considering the
severity of the crime and the § 3553(a) factors) is all but frivolous. There were
no objections to the PSR, and both the government and trial counsel
recommended a sentence at the low end of the applicable guideline range–exactly
what the court imposed. Be that as it may, the sentence is within the
2
presumptively reasonable Guideline range and no facts have been suggested to
rebut the presumption. See Rita v. United States, --- U.S. ---, 127 S. Ct. 2456,
2462–63 (2007); United States v. Kristl, 437 F.3d 1050, 1055 (10th Cir. 2006).
Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal and GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr.
Circuit Judge
3