United States v. Kevin Smith

Case: 09-41195 Document: 00511284776 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 4, 2010 No. 09-41195 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. KEVIN MORAN SMITH, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08-CR-107-7 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Kevin Moran Smith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Smith has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Smith’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. Case: 09-41195 Document: 00511284776 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2010 No. 09-41195 existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Smith’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. 2