NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
Nos. 10-1093, 10-1297
_____________
DEVON PARK BIOVENTURES, L.P.
v.
SEBASTIAN HOLDINGS, INC.,
Appellant
_____________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(Civ. No. 2-09-CV-04085)
District Judge: Hon. Paul S. Diamond
_____________
Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
Monday, November 8, 2010
Before: McKEE, Chief Circuit Judge, SLOVITER
and COWEN, Circuit Judges
_____________
(filed: November 16, 2010 )
McKEE, Chief Judge.
Sebastian Holdings, Inc. appeals the district court’s orders affirming the arbitration
awards dated July 7, 2009 and August 26, 2009, denying Sebastian Holdings’s cross-
1
motion to vacate the arbitration awards, and granting the motion of Devon Park
Bioventures, L.P. to Direct Entry of Judgment. We affirm.
Because we write primarily for the parties, we need not repeat the facts or
procedural history of this case, which the district court has previously set forth. Order
Granting Mot. To Confirm Arbitration Award, 1-4, Dec. 3, 2009. Sebastian Holdings
argues that the district court erred in affirming the arbitration awards because the
arbitrator’s decision was unsupported by the plain language of the contract and because
the arbitrator ignored that Benoit Jamar had no authority to act on behalf of Sebastian
Holdings.
In his detailed order, Judge Diamond thoughtfully and thoroughly explained his
reasons for affirming the arbitrator’s decision. See Order Granting Mot. To Confirm
Arbitration Award, 4-9, Dec. 3, 2009. The district court’s Order sufficiently analyzes the
relevant law and applies it to the facts of this case. We can add little to the judge’s
thoughtful analysis or conclusions.
Accordingly, we will affirm the district court’s Orders substantially for the reasons
set for in those Orders without further elaboration.
2