FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 22 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER, No. 09-17461
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00022-GGH
v.
MEMORANDUM *
SPENCE, Officer, Badge #346; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Gregory G. Hollows, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **
Submitted November 16, 2010 ***
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Anthony Richardo Turner appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
comply with a court order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review for an abuse of discretion. Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 986
(9th Cir. 1999). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed Turner’s
action for failure to comply with its discovery order after it warned that
noncompliance could result in dismissal, it granted an extension of time to comply,
and Turner failed to oppose defendants’ motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b). See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir.
2002) (discussing factors that district courts must consider before dismissing under
Rule 41(b)).
Turner’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
Turner’s pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
2 09-17461