UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6356
DAVID M. KISSI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRAMCO II, LLC; DLA PIPER, of Maryland and New York; VENABLE
LLP, of Maryland and New York; FRIEDLANDER MISLER; PAUL
KRAMER, Mr. and Mrs.; GRANGER GEORGE MAHER, III, Mr. and
Mrs.; JOSEPH FRANKLIN BRUCE; JULIAN SPIRER; DONALD KAPLAN;
EMC CORPORATION, Bear Stearns, JP Morgan Chase; MONEY STORE,
First Union, Wachovia, Wells Fargo; WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,
Citicorp; LEGG MASON, INCORPORATED, Mark R. Fetting CEO;
PAUL MEANS, Mr. and Mrs.; COLDWELL BANKER, Joseph Gillespie,
CEO; GE, Steven Wieneke; DAVID WELLS, K Bank (Key Bank);
BUSINESS LOANS EXPRESS, James Quirk; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY;
THE WASHINGTON POST, and Newsweek; MARY GRAHAM; DONALD E.
GRAHAM, Chairman, Washington Post; SAM ZELLER, Chicago
Tribune; TIMOTHY J. RYAN, Publisher, Baltimore Sun;
WASHINGTON TIMES; WENDY MURDOCK, NewsCorp; RUPERT MURDOCK,
NewsCorp; ROLL CALL, Capitol Hill; THE NEW YORK TIMES,
Arthur Ochs Schulzberger; RIGGS HILL CONDO, c/o Hugh
Hardesty, Jr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:09-cv-00267-AW)
Submitted: October 29, 2010 Decided: November 23, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Amy E. Askew, KRAMON &
GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee DLA PIPER.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
David Kissi appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC, No. 8:09-cv-00267-AW (D. Md.
Feb. 12, 2009).
Appellee DLA Piper has moved, pursuant to Fed. R. App.
P. 38, for an order enjoining Kissi from filing an action in any
court, including state courts, without prior approval. We find
the authority cited by DLA Piper to be unpersuasive in
supporting such a blanket injunction. However, in light of
Kissi’s repeated abusive filings, we find sanctions appropriate.
Accordingly, we grant the motion as follows: Kissi is hereby
directed to pay DLA Piper the sum of $500; moreover, he is
enjoined from filing any further actions in this court until
this sanction is paid and a district court judge certifies that
his claim is not frivolous.
We deny Kissi’s motion for appointment of counsel, as
well as all of his remaining pending motions, and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3