UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6556
DAVID M. KISSI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRAMCO II, LLC; DLA PIPER, MD and NY; VENABLE, of MD and NY;
FRIEDLANDER MISLER; PAUL KRAMER, Mr. and Mrs.; Esq.; GRANGER
MAHER, Mr. and Mrs.; Esq.; JOSEPH BRUCE, Esq.; J. THOMAS
GUINTA, Esq.; JULIAN SPIRER, Esq.; DONALD E. KAPLAN, Esq.;
EMC/BEAR STEARNS/JP MORGAN CHASE; MONEY STORE/FIRST
UNION/WACHOVIA/WELLS FARGO; WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK/CITICORP;
LEGG MASON, Mark R. Fetting; CEO; PAUL MEANS, Mr. and Mrs.;
COLDWELL BANKER, Joseph Gillespie; CEO; GE CAPITAL, Steve
Wieneke; DAVID WELLS, K Bank (Key Bank); BUSINESS LOANS
EXPRESS, James Quirk; WELLS FARGO; THE WASHINGTON
POST/NEWSWEEK; MARY GRAHAM, Chairman; The Washington Post;
DONALD E. GRAHAM, Chairman; The Washington Post; SAM ZELLER,
Chicago Tribune; TIMOTHY R. RYAN, Publisher; The Baltimore
Sun; THE WASHINGTON TIMES; WENDY MURDOCK, NewsCorp; RUPERT
MURDOCK, NewsCorp; ROLL CALL, Capitol Hill; THE NEW YORK
TIMES, Arthur Ochs Schulzberger; RIGGS HILL CONDO, c/o Hugh
Hardesty Jr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:08-cv-01174-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: October 29, 2010 Decided: November 23, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se. Amy E. Askew, James Patrick
Ulwick, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee
DLA PIPER.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
David Kissi appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Kissi v. Pramco II, LLC, No. 1:08-cv-01174-GBL-JFA (E.D.
Va. filed Mar. 4, 2009, and entered Mar. 6, 2009).
Appellee DLA Piper has moved, pursuant to Fed. R. App.
P. 38, for an order enjoining Kissi from filing an action in any
court, including state courts, without prior approval. We find
the authority cited by DLA Piper to be unpersuasive in
supporting such a blanket injunction. However, in light of
Kissi’s repeated abusive filings, we find sanctions appropriate.
Accordingly, we grant the motion as follows: Kissi is hereby
directed to pay DLA Piper the sum of $500; moreover, he is
enjoined from filing any further actions in this court until
this sanction is paid and a district court judge certifies that
his claim is not frivolous.
We deny Kissi’s motion for appointment of counsel, as
well as all his remaining pending motions, and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3