Solimine v. Ortho McNeil

May 30, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 94-1944 ANTHONY SOLIMINE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ORTHO MCNEIL, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge] Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges. Anthony Solimine on brief pro se. Per Curiam. We have reviewed appellant's brief and the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum, dated April 26, 1994. Appellant's "motion for leave to file up to ten (10) page memorandum on supplemental authorities and an appendix" and "motion for leave to file brief memorandum of supplemental authorities" are denied. They are extremely tardy and, in any event, present nothing of merit. Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied. The district court's order of dismissal is affirmed. -2-